Cholesterol Denialism: Understanding Its Evolution and Impact
Written on
Chapter 1: The Concept of Cholesterol Denialism
The phrase "Cholesterol Denialism" may not be widely acknowledged, yet it has subtly permeated discussions about health over the years, similar to the term "pseudoscience."
The Slow Evolution of Cholesterol Denialism
Early indications of cholesterol skepticism can be traced back to 1913, when Russian scientist Nikolaj Anitschkow conducted experiments on rabbits. He fed these animals a diet high in cholesterol and observed that they developed increased atherosclerosis in their aorta. This pivotal research sparked the notion of a strong connection between elevated cholesterol levels and plaque buildup in blood vessels. Nevertheless, Anitschkow's findings faced considerable skepticism as other scientists struggled to replicate these results in different species.
Would you trust animal study outcomes without human corroboration? Personally, I would likely hesitate.
The Cholesterol Wars
By the late 20th century, the debate surrounding cholesterol was heating up, notably with a controversial article published in Atlantic magazine in 1989 titled "The Cholesterol Myth." The piece contended that reducing cholesterol through dietary changes or medication wouldn't necessarily extend lifespan. Concurrently, some experts claimed that statins operated not merely by lowering LDL-C (low-density lipoprotein cholesterol) but had additional, yet-to-be-identified, effects on health.
The Turning Point
As scientific inquiry continued, researchers introduced medications such as ezetimibe, which inhibits cholesterol absorption in the intestine, and PCSK9 inhibitors, which target cholesterol receptors in cells. These breakthroughs underscored the significant role of cholesterol in heart disease, leaving little room for doubt.
The Rise of Pseudoscience
One might question how cholesterol denialism has transitioned into a form of pseudoscience over time. This shift occurred gradually, as knowledgeable individuals clung to outdated beliefs and resisted adapting to new findings. Unlike other pseudosciences often propagated by social media, cholesterol denialism stems from a reluctance to alter deeply held convictions, a trend exacerbated by the recent pandemic.
The lesson from this narrative is that cholesterol denialism serves as a cautionary tale. It emphasizes that even well-meaning skeptics are not immune to the pitfalls of rejecting established scientific evidence.
Fortunately, with the advancement of modern technology, we possess a robust body of evidence affirming cholesterol's contribution to atherosclerosis, leaving no space for contemporary skeptics.
In this video, Christopher Labos explores how skepticism regarding cholesterol has evolved into pseudoscience, highlighting key experiments and the ongoing debates.
References
Labos, C. (2024). Cholesterol Denialism is Pseudoscience. Medscape.
Labos, C. (2024). How Cholesterol Denialism Became Pseudoscience. The Skeptic.
How cholesterol denialism went from reasonable skepticism to pseudoscience. (2024). Skeptic.
Chapter 2: Lessons Learned
This video provides insights on identifying and countering pseudoscience, using cholesterol denialism as a case study.