Mysteries of Language

The significance of language in our lives cannot be overstated. Without it, comprehension of these sentences would be impossible, and much of our culture, wisdom, and historical narratives would vanish. While many creatures communicate through various means, humans uniquely possess complex languages. Thus, it's natural to ponder the origins of our linguistic capabilities.

Current theories suggest that Homo sapiens developed language between 50,000 and 150,000 years ago. Various hypotheses abound, from the use of tools to genetic mutations. A familiar notion is that language emerged alongside the mastery of fire and the practice of cooking, or that primitive sounds gradually transformed into structured language.

However, the quest for answers is complicated by a lack of physical evidence. This uncertainty fuels the imagination of those who wonder about the identity of the first speaker, the content of their words, and the circumstances surrounding their speech.

Among these inquisitive minds is Sverker Johansson, a 60-year-old Senior Advisor at Dalarna University in Sweden. His quest for answers has driven him to dedicate years to this exploration. Therefore, my excitement was palpable when I discovered a piece by The Guardian detailing his insights.

Moving Beyond Outdated Thinking

Johansson has authored multiple books on the subject, the first published in 2005, with a subsequent release on September 2, 2021. However, advancements in research have led to some corrections since his initial publication.

One major revelation arose five years post his first book: researchers successfully sequenced the entire Neanderthal genome, confirming interbreeding between Neanderthals and Homo sapiens. This discovery implies that if Homo sapiens possessed language, then Neanderthals likely did as well. As Johansson aptly notes, “If two people have kids together, I very much doubt that one was without language and the other one with.”

This realization challenges the stereotype of Neanderthals as mere primitive beings, suggesting a more complex reality.

Gender Bias

Another aspect worth considering is the bias rooted in our historical understanding of gender roles. Much of human history has been interpreted through a patriarchal lens, which extends to our understanding of female biology—distinct from that of males in several significant ways.

This bias becomes particularly evident when examining the lives of our early ancestors, especially given the evidence suggesting they may have lived in egalitarian societies where women had equal status to men. Women were not merely gatherers; they were also warriors. Recent research indicates that women might have produced as many stone tools as their male counterparts, contradicting the assumption that such artifacts were solely male-made.

In discussions about language, Johansson emphasizes that women communicate as effectively as men. Thus, it stands to reason that women should not be overlooked in this narrative. This perspective aligns with the longstanding cultural notion that women tend to engage in more conversation than men.

The New Truth About Language

By stripping away unconscious gender biases and acknowledging the possibility that multiple human species may have used language, new theories emerge that hold considerable weight. American anthropologist Sarah Blaffer Hrdy highlights the essential role of language in childcare and childbirth, a notion supported by Johansson.

This idea presents a more compelling case than the theories suggesting language arose from boredom during activities like grooming or campfires. Childcare demands coordination, especially in community settings where numerous children require attention. Effective communication is crucial for safety in such contexts.

Passing the Chimp Test

The robustness of this hypothesis is further validated by what is known as “the chimp test.” This principle posits that any theory regarding the evolution of human behavior can be assessed against the behavior of chimpanzees and other closely related primates.

For instance, the grooming hypothesis, which posits that language evolved from the intimacy of grooming behaviors among chimps, falters upon scrutiny—if true, why have other primates not developed similar language skills?

Conversely, the theory that language originated among women due to childbirth withstands this test. Human females typically require assistance during childbirth, highlighting the importance of trust and cooperation—elements that could drive the development of language. In contrast, chimpanzee females often give birth in isolation, thus lacking the same social dynamics that foster language.

Perspective Shift

It's crucial to remain aware of modern cultural biases while interpreting our ancient past. The suggestion that women played a significant role in the genesis of language is revolutionary and prompts further inquiry. If this theory holds water, it could explain why many ancient cultures were either egalitarian or matriarchal.

Moreover, with the newfound understanding that Neanderthals were capable of language, one must question the assumption that Homo sapiens were the first to master it. Notably, Neanderthals had larger brains and, in some respects, displayed more advanced traits. Could it be that they were the ones who introduced Homo sapiens to the concept of spoken language? The possibilities are intriguing.

Katrina Paulson crafts essays that explore culture, ideas, and the intricacies of life. She is the creator of the Curious Adventure and Curious Life newsletters, which delve into life's curiosities and encourage a shift in perspective.

You can support Katrina by subscribing to Medium, where you can enjoy her articles alongside those from other esteemed publications and independent writers. Your support is greatly appreciated.